1.) a.) They could propose that the two new staff be transferred to another school or fired because of inexperience with teaching or other reasons.
b.)Another proposal they could propose is compiling more students from another professor and merge classes with two professors to speed up learning.
2.) They work against the students learning and time that they are going to graduate. This means they need to get more finance into education , time off work to learn and delay how soon they will be able to get a job in the career they want with their diploma.
3.) a.)They could try and get the class at another university if both universities can cooperate for the good of education.
b.) Another proposal they could get is have some exemption to class cancellation due to low student count if the class has students who require the class to graduate.
4.) a.)Low student count , new adjucents being hired, the file cabinet being taken away.
b.) Spending the money on nine students wouldn't be cost efficient, The file cabinet was needed by another professor that had more students, the new staff needed experience so liquidation of a current professors class with experience was needed.
5.) a.)Helped me think on broad ideas with problems and how to show that it is a problem with good examples.
b.) Helped me think about solutions because of the needs and dedication of students who want things to get done but the system of academia wont let them for some poorly constructed reason.
i like the points you gave for this blog. i also agree with your 4b i didnt see it from that perspective.
ReplyDeleteI agree with 1b, they should combine classes but only if its on a similar subject. Saves time and money. Also with 4b too, professor with experience should be kept and teach students. This would be more effective than having a sub that lack any experience at all.
ReplyDelete