Discussion Questions # 3

1)  I generally read over an assignment a total of two times maximum, as bad as it sounds I usually understand what I have to do after two reading sessions. I think that reading the assignment paper more then two times is definitely worthwhile. Reading the paper after your first draft can be helpful because sometimes students might go into the work before clearly reading the assignment paper and do it completely wrong because of format or some other reason, this is definitely a benefit to read after your first draft so your second draft can be correct and close to an A.


2) You can apply Evidence consideration to your own personal argument to strengthen your point. Evidence is the bread and butter to any proven point and its necessary. Considering evidence will ensure your point is held above the audience and critics.


3)  To me the most useful section of the analysis section was the instruction to analyze the separate parts of a paper and seeing how they are related to each other. This skill is very useful to help sort out a paper you don't quite understand. I think we should go over the part where it says to engage in open inquiry even when the answer of the argument is known.


4) Similarities include evidence in the writers work and being fair and open minded rather then closed and stubborn to suggestions or overpowering argument. Also clear facts that the writer is cool headed and will not attack the audience or critics reading the material the writer has presented.